Redskins/Colts

Redskins send:

PLAYER: Hall
POS: CB
POT: A
AGE: 26
OVR: 88

PLAYER: Amstrong
POS: WR
POT: B
AGE: 72
OVR: 27

2nd pick

Colts send:

PLAYER: Wayne
POS: WR
POT: A
AGE: 31
OVR: 97

PLAYER: Lacey
POS: CB
POT: C
AGE: 23
OVR: 71

3rd pick

Wayne's like, 97??? He's 31 but its not like he was 35 or something. He wont retire or suddenly become useless. We'll play max 2 years which will bring us to around end of April/early May. Wayne will still be a dominant WR, maxed cth/rte/cit and stuff.

At 97 and being maxed in several categories, its a not like Wayne needs to improve at anything anyway. Kinda hard to improve on maxed cth/rte/cit :/

The picks were added because based on the 4 players we switch, I send the top guy which means, picks were used to even it out. We added the picks to even it out instead of adding a 3rd player on each side that would make it a bit more fair. Was more simple using picks.

To make it 100% fair without the picks, he'd need to add sommeone higher than either Hall or Armstrong but we figured using picks was another way to make it fair.

I see it more like skins give up a 3rd and the colts drop their pick. Right now this is pretty much a damn near 90 cb a low 70s (mid 70s at end of year) WR and another 80 ovr A pot player for wayne, a low 70 C pot CB, and a 70s player probably low C pot. That's too much.

dont approve redskins dosent need to give up a pick reggie wayne is older and colts are giving up c pot guy for a and b..... young a pot and semi young b pot for a old a pot and young c pot isnt even

So you're saying 2 players for 2 players without picks?

no were saying 2 redskins players for 2 colts players and a 3rd

BiGDaDDyNaPSacK said Skins give a 3rd, Colts dont give a pick btw. You likely read his post incorrectly. Basically, Skins wouldnt give me their 2nd anymore and I wouldnt give them a 3rd anymore. They'd give me a 3rd instead.

Reason is, Wayne's 97 and Hall's 88, I'm guessing thats his reasoning.

At this point, we're splitting hair anyway. I dont really care either way. Its not like a 3rd will change anything.

yea thats what he said..... i said sumtn different...... u cant give up a old good wr and garbage player that wont get better, for 2 player that get better. by time d. hall is 31 he will proli be just as good if not better than wayne

Hall drops to 86, down to even 83 by 2012 is alot of franchises btw, check around on xtreme to see, very easy.

We wont be playing like 3-4 more years anyway, this isnt an offline franchise and this is january. I doubt we get far into the 3rd year. Wayne, by then, will still be 95+ and Hall wont be 90+, thats if he didnt dropped.

Anyhow, you guys need to agree on something. One wants Skins to send a 3rd, 1 wants Cols to send a 3rd (I hardly see how that makes sense but...).

I still dont see how I'd need to send a 3rd on top of sending the best player in the deal.

he is the pnly one me n phil said the same thing and jj hasnt said ne thing

Redskins send:

PLAYER: Hall
POS: CB
POT: A
AGE: 26
OVR: 88

PLAYER: Amstrong
POS: WR
POT: B
AGE: 72
OVR: 27

3rd pick

Colts send:

PLAYER: Wayne
POS: WR
POT: A
AGE: 31
OVR: 97

PLAYER: Lacey
POS: CB
POT: C
AGE: 23
OVR: 71

This is what I was saying I believe the deal should be. Pop has a point about D hall not progressing and wayne not drastically degressing. The 3rd will get Pop another 70 something player come draft time which would make up for the overall difference. I think a 2nd from the Skins in this particular draft would be too much as that still could be a 80+ A pot player. I would have no problem approving this trade.

now tht i see what ppl are saying..i dont agree...